Hi folks,
With the new evidence connecting Sidney Rigdon with Solomon Spalding and the production of the Book of Mormon, I thought I would post an article that some may not have heard about before. It's actually a chapter from a book and it talks about something called the "Everlasting Gospel". I think you will find it interesting.
Art
CHAPTER IX
"THE EVERLASTING GOSPEL"
Having presented the evidence which shows that the historical part of the Mormon Bible was supplied by the Spaulding manuscript, we may now pay attention to other evidence, which indicates that the entire conception of a revelation of golden plates by an angel was not even original, and also that its suggester was Rigdon. This is a subject which has been overlooked by investigators of the Mormon Bible.
That the idea of the revelation as described by Smith in his autobiography was not original is shown by the fact that a similar divine message, engraved on plates, was announced to have been received from an angel nearly six hundred years before the alleged visit of an angel to Smith. These original plates were described as of copper, and the recipient was a monk named Cyril, from whom their contents passed into the possession of the Abbot Joachim, whose "Everlasting Gospel," founded thereon, was offered to the church as supplanting the New Testament, just as the New Testament had supplanted the Old, and caused so serious a schism that Pope Alexander IV took the severest measures against it.1
The evidence that the history of the "Everlasting Gospel" of the thirteenth century supplied the idea of the Mormon Bible lies not only in the resemblance between the celestial announcement of both, but in the fact that both were declared to have the same important purport -- as a forerunner of the end of the world.-- and that the name "Everlasting Gospel" was adopted and constantly used in connection with their message by the original leaders in the Mormon church.
_________________________
1 [John W.] Draper's "Intellectual Development of Europe," Vol. II, Chap. III. For an exhaustive essay on the "Everlasting Gospel," by Renan, see Revue des Delcx Mondes, June, 1866. For John of Parma's part in the Gospel, see "Histoire Litteraire de la France" (1842), Vol. XX, p. 24.
-------- THE EVERLASTING GOSPEL 75 --------
If it is asked, How could Rigdon become acquainted with the story of the original "Everlasting Gospel," the answer is that it was just such subjects that would most attract his attention, and that his studies had led him into directions where the story of Cyril's plates would probably have been mentioned. He was a student of every subject out of which he could evolve a, sect, from the time of his Pittsburg pastorate. Hepworth Dixon said, "He knew the writings of Maham, Gates, and Boyle, writings in which love and marriage are considered in relation to Gospel liberty and the future life."1 H. H. Bancroft, noting his appointment as Professor of Church History in Nauvoo University, speaks of him as "versed in history, belles-lettres, and oratory.2 Mrs. James A. Garfield told Mrs. Dickenson that Rigdon taught her father Latin and Greek.3 David Whitmer, who was intimately acquainted with the early history of the church, testified: "Rigdon was a thorough biblical scholar, a man of fine education and a powerful orator."4 A writer, describing Rigdon while the church was at Nauvoo, said, "There is no divine in the West more learned in biblical literature and the history of the world than he."5 All this indicates that a knowledge of the earlier "Everlasting Gospel" was easily within Rigdon's reach. We may even surmise the exact source of this knowledge. Mosheim's "Ecclesiastical History, Ancient and Modern" was at his disposal. Editions of it had appeared in London in 1765, 1768, 1774, 1782, 1790, 1806, 18I4 and 1826, and among the abridgments was one published in Philadelphia in 1812. In this work he could have read as follows: --
"About the commencement of this (the thirteenth) century there were handed about in Italy several pretended prophecies of the famous Joachim, abbot of Sora in Calabria, whom the multitude revered as a person divinely inspired, and equal to the most illustrious prophets of ancient times. The greatest part of these predictions were contained in a certain book entitled, 'The Everlasting Gospel,' which was also commonly called the Book of Joachim. This Joachim, whether a real or fictitious person we shall not pretend to determine, among many other events, foretold the destruction of the Church of Rome, whose corruptions he censured with the greatest severity, and the promulgation of a new and more perfect gospel in the age of the Holy Ghost, by a set of poor and austere ministers, whom God was to raise up and employ for that purpose."
_________________________
1 "Spiritual Wives," p. 62.
2 "Utah," p. 146.
3 Scribner's Magazine, October, 1881.
4 "Address to All Believers in Christ," p. 35.
5 Letter in the New York Herald.
-------- 76 THE STORY OF THE MORMONS --------
Here is a perfect outline of the scheme presented by the original Mormons, with Joseph as the divinely inspired prophet, and an "Everlasting Gospel," the gift of an angel, promulgated by poor men like the travelling Mormon elders. The original suggestion of an "Everlasting Gospel" is found in Revelation xiv, 6 and 7: --
"And I saw another angel fly in the midst of heaven, having the everlasting in gospel to preach unto them that dwell on the earth, and to every nation, and kindred, and tongue, and people,
"Saying with a loud voice, Fear God, and give glory to him; for the hour of his judgment is come: and worship him that made heaven, and earth, and the sea, and the fountains of water."1
This was the angel of Cyril; this the announcement of those "latter days" from which the Mormon church, on Rigdon's motion soon took its name.
That Rigdon's attention had been attracted to an "Everlasting Gospel" is proved by the constant references made to it in writings of which he had at least the supervision, from the very beginning of the church. Thus, when he preached his first sermon before a Mormon audience -- on the occasion of his visit to Smith at Palmyra in I830 -- he took as his text a part of the version of Revelation xiv, which he had put into the Mormon Bible (I Nephi xiii. 40), and in his sermon, as reported by Tucker, who heard it, holding the Scriptures in one hand and the Mormon Bible in the other, he said, "that they were inseparably necessary to complete the everlasting gospel of the Saviour Jesus Christ." In the account in Smith's autobiography, of the first description of the buried book given to Smith by the angel, its two features are named separately, first, "an account of the former inhabitants of this continent," and then the fulness of the Everlasting Gospel." That Rigdon never lost sight of the importance, in his view, of an "Everlasting Gospel" may be seen from the following quotation from one of his articles in his Pittsburg organ, the Messenger and Advocate, of June 15, 1845,
_________________________
1 "Bisping (after Gerlach) takes Rev. xiv. 6-11 to foretell that three great events at the end of the last world-week are immediately to precede Christ's second advent: (1) the announcement of the "eternal' Gospel to the whole world (Matt. xxiv. 14); (2) the Fall of Babylon; (3) a warning to all who worship the beast. . . Burger says this vision can denote nothing but a last admonition and summons to conversion shortly before the end." -- Note in "Commentary by Bishops and Other Clergy of the Anglican Church."
-------- THE EVERLASTING GOSPEL 77 --------
after his expulsion from Nauvoo: "It is a strict observance of the principles of the fulness of the Everlasting Gospel of Jesus Christ, as contained in the Bible, Book of Mormon, and Book of Covenants, which alone will insure a man an inheritance in the kingdom of our God."
The importance attached to the "Everlasting Gospel" by the founders of the church is seen further in the references to it in the "Book of Doctrine and Covenants," which it is not necessary to cite,1 and further in a pamphlet by Elder Moses [Martin] of New York (1842), entitled "A Treatise on the Fulness of the Everlasting Gospel, setting forth its First Principles, Promises, and Blessings," in which he argued that the appearance of the angle to Smith was in direct line with the Scriptural teaching, and that the last days were near.
_________________________
1 For examples see Sec. 68, 1; Sec. 101, 22; Sec. 124, 88
Thursday, February 11, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Is this from William A. Linn's 1901 book "The Story of the Mormons"?
ReplyDeleteYes.
ReplyDeleteWell, I submit the 'everlasting gospel' has been the 800 lb gorilla in the room for about 2000 years - the very words Jesus spoke. As it was then it is now. The perversion of the message is, and always was, a dreadful thing. Faithfulness to the words have always been supreme blessings.
ReplyDeleteNothing is new:-)
So how is it LDS can say our part of the new covenant is keeping His commandments, which is surely true, but they do not do, and others thinking our need to keep them is not as important as He said it was? I find that either extreme is off the pathway - but that's just my view.
Hi Richard,
ReplyDeleteLet's take your premise and look into it. First of all, what I am referring to as "the everlasting gospel" is how it is being described in the book, namely the angel who supposedly gave the alleged gospel to Cyril the monk, as well as Smith's Moroni, who supposedly gave him the plates from which he claimed to have translated the Book of Mormon. The Bible is quite clear as to how we are to treat any "gospel" that differes from what the Bible says, as in Galatians chapter 1, verses 6 - 8 where it says, "6) I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ, unto another gospel: 7)which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ. 8)But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed." There's also the passage in the book of Revelation chapter22, verses 18 and 19 which say, "18)For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, if any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: 19)and if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book."
These two sets of passages from the Bible are very clear and also very easy to understand. Based on what they say, it is obvious that Cyril's "everlasting gospel" and Smith's Book of Mormon are false gospel's and are not to be believed.
This also goes to the very heart of Smith's First Vision, as least to the version he first used, which was very "evangelical" in nature, with it basically just being Jesus telling him that his sins were forgiven. Also, in the early accounts, it Smith claims that it was through diligent and long hours of studying the Bible, NOT some claimed revelation from God, that led him to the notion that all churches were in error. This is very important to note, because if indeed it was through diligent study of the Bible that Smith decided that all churches were in error, there wouldn't be any need at all for the Book of Mormon, because the Bible would have to be complete in order for Smith to tell a "good" church from one that was in error. A Bible that wasn't missing the "many plain and precious truths" was a problem for Smith, so the "vision" had to be asjusted so as to provide an excuse for the existence of the Book of Mormon.
I deliberately used the King James Version of the Bible for any of the faithful in the audience. Frankly, I prefer the NIV or some other more easily read version.
All of this being said, I have to agree with you regarding those extremists on either end, because they read something more into the Scriptures than what is there. As I said, however, the Bible is amazingly clear about those who would attempt to pervert or otherwise alter the gospel message.
What are we to do? Follow the words and teachings of Jesus. It's that simple and at the same time difficult, because of the nature of man to try to save himself and give himself credit for doing so.
This is the way I see it. Comments and/or questions?
Art